Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02823
Original file (BC 2014 02823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 					DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02823
 							COUNSEL:  NONE
							HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her 11 Mar 11 application for transfer of her Post-9/11 GI Bill 
Educational Benefits to her dependents be approved with an  Active 
Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date of 10 May 15.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She applied for Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) on 11 Mar 11; 
however, unknowingly, she did not sign the required TEB Statement 
of Understanding (SOU) required for approval.  

She was unaware that she had not signed the SOU until she received 
a notice from the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) in May 13.  On 
9 May 13, she signed the TEB and was approved the same day 
incurring a 4 year ADSC.

She had no idea she was accruing an additional ADSC for the TEB.  
The mistake was not made with malice.  She requests her TEB 
effective date be 11 Mar 11 with an ADSC of 10 May 15.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Transferability of Unused Education Benefits to Family Members. 
Subject to the provisions of DoDI 1341.13, Post-9/11 GI Bill, the 
Secretary concerned, to promote recruitment and retention in the 
Uniformed Services, may permit an individual eligible for Post-
9/11 GI Bill educational assistance to elect to transfer to one or 
more of his or her family members all or a portion of his or her 
entitlement to such assistance. 

Per DoDI 1341.13 and AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Programs, 
Atch 9, any service member on or after 1 Aug 09, who is entitled 
to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at the time of the approval of his or her 
request to transfer that entitlement under this section, may 
transfer that entitlement provided he or she has at least 6 years 
of service in the Military Services (active duty or Selected 
Reserve), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
Commissioned Officer Corps (NOAA) Corps, or Commissioned Corps of 
the Public Health Service (PHS) on the date of approval and agrees 
to serve 4 additional years in the Military Services, NOAA Corps, 
or PHS from the date of election.

The applicant is on active duty in the Regular Air Force in the 
grade of lieutenant colonel (0-5).  Her Total Active Federal 
Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 21 Dec 94. 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial as there is no evidence the applicant 
signed the SOU in Mar 11.  The applicant applied for TEB on 11 Mar 
11 but failed to sign the SOU.  Without a SOU, the TFSC personnel 
cannot determine if a member accepts the 4 year ADSC; therefore, 
no eligibility for the program could be established as the 
law/regulations cite the date of request as the date on which the 
appropriate service obligation would be established In Accordance 
With (IAW) AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Programs, Attachment 
9, A9.18.1.2, A9.18.1.3 and A9.18.1.4.  

A complete copy of the DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 22 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.




THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-02823 in Executive Session on 23 Mar 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member 

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 14.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 22 Aug 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.


 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01486

    Original file (BC 2014 01486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member states that he reapplied for the benefit which also required a reenlistment well beyond 20 years of service. Examiner’s Note: According to the DD Form 4/1, the applicant would have had the retainability required for TEB at the time of his Jul 11 submission. Without a signed SOU, the TEB application cannot be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02362

    Original file (BC 2014 02362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 Mar 13, the applicant requested an extension of his enlistment to 14 Aug 16 (his HYT date) for the purpose of qualifying to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits, which was approved on 3 Apr 13. While he has since been promoted to master sergeant, at the time he tried to transfer his TEB he was serving in the grade of technical sergeant with a HYT date of 14 Aug 16, thus making him ineligible to serve for an additional four years. Furthermore, in accordance with AFI 36-2306 the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233

    Original file (BC 2013 05233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00189

    Original file (BC 2014 00189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website, it notifies the applicants that their transfer request is not final until the SOU is digitally signed in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). On 12 Oct 10, an email was sent to the applicant informing her that her application for TEB had expired because she did not sign the SOU. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03835

    Original file (BC 2013 03835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03835 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents without incurring an additional Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05014

    Original file (BC 2013 05014.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05014 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be reestablished based on the contract she signed in Jun 10 and the remaining Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for the TEB be waived. In Jun 10, when she was approved for the Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB, she incurred a four-year ADSC of 24 Jun 14 (HYT for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04006

    Original file (BC-2012-04006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. By the time she completed the process to extend on active duty, signed the SOU, and received approval for TEB she had an outstanding...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00802

    Original file (BC 2014 00802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00802 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date be adjusted to 17 Sep 13 instead of 13 Apr 15 for the purposes of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB). The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02875

    Original file (BC 2013 02875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB requires: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...